#Auditory senses driver

Together, these dynamic adaptations are critical to survival. Moreover, as highlighted in the above examples, the integration of sensory inputs also provides information concerning meaning, influenced by the valence of the stimuli, which then guides appropriate action (primarily conceptualized in terms of approach vs. This process is dynamic, with perceptual inferences continuously and rapidly being updated in order to allow for adaptive responses to changing bodily properties, or to an environment that is changing ( Ernst and Bülthoff, 2004). The brain constantly integrates, prioritizes, and filters numerous different sources of incoming sensory information, combining them with the aid of prior knowledge and experience, in order to create a unique perception – namely, a perceptual inference – concerning our body and the environment that surrounds it ( Knill and Richards, 1996 Kersten and Yuille, 2003 Ernst and Bülthoff, 2004). The richness of such multisensory experiences are often taken for granted due to the seamless integration of numerous different sensory inputs. Or, in contrast, we experience the jolting sensation of a braking car combined with the sickening sound of tires skidding across the road’s surface. For example, we see and feel ourselves being gently stroked.

#Auditory senses driver

Our perception of our own bodies and our experience of the world around us is fundamentally multisensory in nature ( Stein and Meredith, 1993 Driver and Spence, 2000). Such findings are relevant to the design of auditory cues associated with product interaction, and the use of auditory cues in sport performance and therapeutic situations given the impact on motor behavior. Moreover, auditory cues impact both motor behavior and emotional valence, the latter showing that sounds that are highly incongruent with the performed movement induce feelings of unpleasantness (perhaps associated with lower processing fluency). The available research convincingly demonstrates that perceptions of the body, of movement, and of surface contact features (e.g., roughness) are influenced by the addition of non-veridical auditory cues. Additionally, given that similar cross-modal processes likely occur regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory input, studying incongruent interactions are likely to also help us predict interactions between congruent inputs. Inaccurate auditory cues provide a unique opportunity to study cross-modal processes: the ability to detect the impact of each sense when they provide a slightly different message is greater. Here we review the rapidly growing literature investigating the influence of non-veridical auditory cues (i.e., inaccurate in terms of their context, timing, and/or spectral distribution) on multisensory body and action perception, and on motor behavior. The sounds that result from our movement and that mark the outcome of our actions typically convey useful information concerning the state of our body and its movement, as well as providing pertinent information about the stimuli with which we are interacting. 3Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

2Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia.1Pain and Perception Lab, IIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.